<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>A Pediatric Board Forum by PBR Has MOVED!  &#187;  Topic: X-rays for DDH, developmental dysplasia of the hip</title>
		<atom:link href="http://forum.pediatricsboardreview.com/forums/topic/x-rays-for-ddh-developmental-dysplasia-of-the-hip/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://forum.pediatricsboardreview.com/forums/topic/x-rays-for-ddh-developmental-dysplasia-of-the-hip/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.5.8-5815</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://forum.pediatricsboardreview.com/forums/topic/x-rays-for-ddh-developmental-dysplasia-of-the-hip/#post-235</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[X-rays for DDH, developmental dysplasia of the hip]]></title>
					<link>http://forum.pediatricsboardreview.com/forums/topic/x-rays-for-ddh-developmental-dysplasia-of-the-hip/#post-235</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 23:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>bdig</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I have been looking at several different guidelines RE: DDH and CT after age 4 months.  In practice, I have never seen a CT done. Here’s the medscape article: <a href="http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/408225-overview#showall" rel="nofollow">http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/408225-overview#showall</a>  and <a href="http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1248135-workup#a0720" rel="nofollow">http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1248135-workup#a0720</a>.</p>
<p>So, the wording on the DDH question in the Q&amp;A book (#8 on p. 14 online) should be <strong>x-ray</strong> instead of CT. Right?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://forum.pediatricsboardreview.com/forums/topic/x-rays-for-ddh-developmental-dysplasia-of-the-hip/#post-236</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Reply To: X-rays for DDH, developmental dysplasia of the hip]]></title>
					<link>http://forum.pediatricsboardreview.com/forums/topic/x-rays-for-ddh-developmental-dysplasia-of-the-hip/#post-236</link>
					<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 23:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>You’r right. And thanks so much for the references. It really helps when I get those!</p>
<p>I also reviewed the AAP guidelines in a Pediatrics article. No mention of CT. Just radiographs. &#8211; <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/105/4/896.full.pdf+html" rel="nofollow">http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/105/4/896.full.pdf+html</a></p>
<p>Here’s the revised section from the book. I’ve also modified the Q&amp;A book.</p>
<h2>DEVELOPMENTAL DYSPLASIA OF THE HIP (DDH)</h2>
<p>Infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) may be noted to have a leg-length discrepancy or extra creases at the thigh. Girls and breech deliveries pose a higher risk. <strong>Workup varies</strong> by age and family history. Treatment requires a Pavlik harness.</p>
<p>* <strong>CRITERIA FOR A CHILD LESS THAN 4 MONTHS:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>ASYMPTOMATIC: </strong>If there is a history of DDH in a <strong>first degree relative</strong>, get an <strong>ultrasound</strong>!</li>
<li><strong>SYMPTOMATIC:</strong> If there are signs of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) on exam, get an <strong>ultrasound!</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>* <strong>CRITERIA FOR A CHILD GREATER THAN 4 MONTHS: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>ASYMPTOMATIC</strong>: If there is no family history, then <strong>no workup </strong>is needed. If there is a history of DDH in a <strong>first degree relative</strong> and an evaluation was never done, then since the child is now greater than 4 months of age, <strong>plain radiographs (hip x-rays)</strong> would be indicated. Plain x-rays are more reliable than an ultrasound at this age (femoral head ossification centers are more developed).</li>
<li><strong>SYMPTOMATIC:</strong> For any child greater than 4 months of age that has signs of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) on examination (regardless of family history), they need to be worked up. Therefore, <strong>get plain radiographs </strong>(not an ultrasound) since they’re more reliable at this age.</li>
</ul>
<p>* <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PEARLS</span>:</strong>  The age cutoff for ultrasounds is 4 months, <strong>NOT</strong> 6. When it comes to the Barlow and Ortolani signs, <strong>EITHER of them being positive should prompt a workup</strong>!</p>
<p>* <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">IMAGE</span></strong>: <a href="http://bit.ly/qHTScy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/qHTScy</a></p>
<p>* <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">IMAGE</span></strong>: <a href="http://bit.ly/qTQrK8" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/qTQrK8</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

